O Estado Administrativo no Brasil: um transplante jurídico imperfeito

Anna Carolina  Migueis

doi:10.46818/pge.v5i2.300

Authors

Anna Carolina Migueis Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7574-339X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46818/pge.v5i2.300

Keywords:

Administrative Law, Administrative State, Deep State, Originalism, Legal Transplants

Abstract

This article aims to introduce the American discussions regarding the legitimacy of the administrative state to the Brazilian reader and analyze in which extension these debates apply to Brazil. After presenting arguments on both sides, the paper explains why the American administrative state debate cannot be fully transplanted to the Brazilian legal system, emphasizing the Brazilian civil law tradition, the analytical characteristics of the 1988 Constitution and its high levels of amendments. In the following section, the paper scrutinizes how the American administrative state doctrine can be useful for Brazilian legal scholars, presenting three possible research paths: discussions regarding administrative rulemaking, the rise of autonomous institutions and its implications to separation of powers theories and, mainly, the democratic legitimacy of non-elected bureaucratic bodies. The paper follows a methodology of qualitative analysis and critical review of the American administrative state bibliography.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALMEIDA, M.; SCAMILLA, B. Estado Administrativo Norte-Americano e Covid-19: contexto e perspectivas. Revista de Estudos Institucionais, Rio de Janeiro, v. 6, n. 3, p. 878-903,2020.

ARAGÃO, Alexandre Santos de. Agências Reguladoras e a Evolução do Direito Administrativo Econômico. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 3ª ed. 2013

ARAGÃO, Alexandre Santos de. (Coord.). O Poder Normativo das Agências Reguladoras. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 2006.BERRY, C.R.; GERSEN, J.E. Agency Design and Distributive Politics. John M. Olin Law & Economics Working Paper, Chicago,n. 539, 2010.

BINENBOJM, Gustavo. Agências Reguladoras Independentes e Democracia no Brasil.Revista de Direito Administrativo, Rio de Janeiro, v. 240,p. 147-165,2005.

BINENBOJM, Gustavo. Uma Teoria de Direito Administrativo: direitos fundamentais, democracia e constitucionalização. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar, 2ª ed. 2008.

CALABRESI, S.G.; LAWSON, G. The Unitary Executive, Jurisdiction Stripping, and the Hamdan Opinions: a textualist response to Justice Scalia. Columbia Law Review, New York, v. 107,p.1002-1047.

CASTOR, Belmiro Valverde Jardim. Os contornos do Estado e da Burocracia no Brasil. In:CASTOR, B. V. J.et. al.Burocracia e Reforma do Estado. Cadernos Adenauer: v. 2, n. 3. São Paulo: Fundação Konrad Adenauer, 2001.

CYRINO, André. Delegações Legislativas, Regulamentos e Administração Pública. Belo Horizonte: Fórum, 2018.

EPSTEIN, Richard A. How Progressives Rewrote the Constitution. Washington: Cato Institute, 2006.

GERSEN, J. E.; STEPHENSON, M. C. Over-Accountability.Journal of Legal Analysis, Chicago, v.6,Issue 2, p. 185-243, 2014.

GOLDSMITH, Jack. Paradoxes of theDeep State. In:SUNSTEIN, Cass R. (Ed.). Can It Happen Here? Authoritarianism in America. California: Day Street Books, p. 106-107, 2018.

MICHAELS, Jon D. The American Deep State. Notre Dame Law Review, Notre Dame, v. 93, p. 107-112, 2018.

GUERRA, Sérgio. Separação de Poderes, Executivo Unitário e Estado Administrativo no Brasil.Revista de Estudos Institucionais, Rio de Janeiro, v. 03, n. 01, 2017.

HAMBURGER, Philip. Is Administrative Law Unlawful? Chicago: The Chicago University Press, 2014.

LANGER, Maximo. From Legal Transplants to Legal Translations: The Globalization of Plea Bargaining and the Americanization Thesis in Criminal Procedure. Harvard International Law Journal, Boston, v. 45,n. 01, p. 01-65, 2004.

LAWSON, Gary. The Rise and Rise of the Administrative State. Harvard Law Review, Boston, v. 107, n.1231, 1994.

LEAL, F.; JORDÃO, E. Quando a Tradução Também Importa: problemas linguísticos de direito comparado. Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Justiça, Porto Alegre, v.8, n. 29, p.86-104, 2014.

LEGRAND, Pierre. The Impossibility of ‘Legal Transplants’. Maastricht Journal of European & Comparative Law, Maastrich, v. 4, p. 111-124, 1997.

LESSIG, L.; SUNSTEIN, C.R. The President and The Administration.Columbia Law Review, New York, v. 94,n.01, p. 01-123,1994.

LIMA, Ruy Cirne. O Conceito Fundamental do Direito Administrativo. Revista de Direito Administrativo, Rio de Janeiro, v. 12, p. 59-64, 1948.LOWI, Theodore. The End of Liberalism,New York: W.W. Norton. 1979.

MARINI, John. Unmasking the Administrative State. The crises of American politics in the twenty-first century. New York: Encounter Books, 2019

MARQUES NETO, Floriano de Azevedo. A Bipolaridade do Direito Administrativo e sua Superação. In: MEDAUAR, O.; SCHIRATO, V. R. (org.). Os Caminhos do Ato Administrativo.Revista dos Tribunais, São Paulo, p. 89-113, 2012, p. 89-113.

MASHAW, Jerry L. Creating the Administrative Constitution: The Lost One Hundred Years in American Administrative Law. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012.

MASHAW, Jerry L. Reasoned Administration and Democratic Legitimacy. How administrative law supports democratic government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.

MELLO, Oswaldo A. Bandeira de. Conceito do Direito Administrativo. Revista de Direito Administrativo, Rio de Janeiro, v. 74, p. 33-44, 1973.

MEIRELLES, Hely Lopes. Direito Administrativo Brasileiro. 13ªed. São Paulo: Editora Revista dos Tribunais, 1987.

METZGER, Gillian E. 1930s Redux: The Administrative State Under Siege. Harvard Law Review, Boston, vol. 131, n. 1, p. 01-95, 2017.

O’DONNELL, Guillermo. Poliarquias e a (in)efetividade da lei na América Latina. Trad. Otacílio Nunes. In: MÉNDEZ, J.; O'DONNELL, G.; PINHEIRO, P.S.(orgs.). The rule of law and the unprivileged in Latin America. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1998.

PARRILLO, Nicholas R. Administrative Law from the Inside Out: Essays in Themes in the Work of Jerry L. Mashaw. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2017.

POSNER, E.A.; VERMEULE, A. The Executive Unbound.After the Madisonian Republic. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.

RAMOS, Alberto Guerreiro. Administração e Contexto Brasileiro. 2ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Fundações Getúlio Vargas, 1983.

ROSE-ACKERMAN, S.; LINDSETH, P.L. (org). Comparative Administrative Law. Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2010

ROSENFELD, Michel. The Rule of Law and the Legitimacy of Constitutional Democracy.Cardozo Law School, Jacob Burns Institute for Advanced Legal Studies. Working Paper Series, New York, n. 36, 2001.

SCHOENBROD, David. Power Without Responsibility: how congress abuses the people through delegation. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993.

SELIN, J.L.; LEWIS, D.E. Sourcebook of United States Executive Agencies. Administrative Conference of the United States. 2ªed. 2018, p. 42, 99 e 100. Disponível em: <https://www.acus.gov/sites/default/files/documents/ACUS%20Sourcebook%20of%20Executive%20Agenices%20 2d%20ed.%20508%20Compliant.pdf> Acesso em: 28out.2021.

SPENCE, D.B.; CROSS, F. A Public Choice Case for the Administrative State. Georgetown Law Journal, WashingtonDC, v. 89, n. 97,pp. 97-142, p. 104, 2000-2001.

STEPHENSON, Matthew C. The Qualities of Public Servants Determine the Quality of Public Service. Michigan Law Review,Law Quadrangle,v. 1177,pp. 1177-1210, 2019.

STEPHENSON, M.C.; VERMEULE, A. Chevron has only one step. Virginia Law Review, Charlottesville, v. 95, n.597, 2019.

SUNSTEIN, Cass R. Chevron as Law. Georgetown Law Journal, Washington DC, v. 107, pp. 1613-1683, 2019.

SUNSTEIN, C. R.; VERMEULE, A. Law & Leviathan: redeeming the administrative state. Cambridge: The Belknap Press ofHarvard University Press, 2020.

VERKUIL, Paul R. Valuing Bureaucracy: the case for professional government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.

VERMEULE, Adrian. Law’s Abnegation:from law’s empire to the administrative state. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 2016.

VERMEULE, Adrian. Conventions of Agency Independence.Columbia Law Review, New York, v. 113,n. 115,2011.

VIBERT, Frank. The Rise of the Unelected. New York: Cambridge University Press,2007.WEBER, Max. The Reich President. SocialResearch,New York,v. 53, n. 125, 1986.

YOO, C.S.; CALABRESI, S.G.; COLANGELO, A.J. The Unitary Executive in the Modern Era: 1945-2004. Iowa Law Review, Iowa City, v. 90, n. 2., p. 601-731, 2009.